Cast
and Credits
William Malone (Director)
Stephen Dorff (Mike Reilly)
Natascha McElhone (Terry Houston)
Stephen Rea (Alistair Pratt)
Udo Kier (Polidori)
Amelia Shankley (Denise)
Jeffrey Combs (Sykes)
Visit
the official Fear dot com website
|
| |
What
would you think if the Internet could carry negative energy
and just bad mojo? You'd be
thinking that you're in a movie, because
this isn't at all possible. Alas, this film is still pretty
good.
But
fear.com has nothing to do with the movie "fear dot
com". I thought it
was related to the movie, but the site in the movie is
feardotcom.com and that site just brings up the WB page for
this movie. Well, there is a flash
page, but its nothing like the
flash page in the movie. This is really my only qualm. They
could have bested "The Blair
Witch" here, but they didn't even come
close.
So what's this "flash page" I keep talking about?
There's this really sick
death site where people can watch this really sick death
guy torture women and then kill them because they asked to
be killed...because he was
torturing them he broke them. Yeah, this
film is not for the squeamish.
The film begins with people dying, and at first the detectives
think it's some kind of
flesh-eating virus, but they soon find no
traces of a virus. They are baffled...until they realize that
everybody who died seemed to be
scared of computers or specifically
the Internet in their last days.
When people log-on to feardotcom.com, they are asked by a woman,
"Do you like to watch?",
"Do you want to hurt me?", then "Do you want
to play? Yes or no." It doesn't matter which they choose,
because once you go to that site,
even if only for a second, you browser
goes back to that site, or your computer turns on and opens
that website. Forcing you to play and win or you will be
dead in 48 hours. You will die of
what you are most afraid of. The
photography and lighting is top notch. They're some really
cool shots as well, great angles.
The thing I probably like most about
this film is that they don't really explain much and they
make you think. Something I wasn't
really expecting before I saw this.
Should you go see this film? Again, if you are squeamish, then
no, this is NOT for you, but if you
like dark films like I do, then
you should see this. This shouldn't be missed then.
--
James (
3 1/2 out of 4 pops )
Talk
about this film with other Popkorn Junkies |
|
Other Junkie's
opinions.....
Billy Ray ( 2 1/2 out
of 4 pops )
After lending his visual touches to episodes of "Tales from the
Crypt" and "Freddy's Nightmares", William Malone made his
feature film debut with "House on Haunted Hill", which I
thought was a brilliant horror film, and leagues better than the
original Vincent Price vehicle. I was, however, skeptical of
"Fear Dot Com". The trailers weren't exactly enticing
and the whole idea seemed kind of nonsensical. However, being the
horror junkie that I am, I purchased my Twizzlers and Mello Yello and
watched the flick anyway. I was split right down the middle.
"Fear Dot Com" is a weird hybrid of several other films, like
"Seven", "What Lies Beneath", and "Dark
City". The cinematography is great and the ending is superb
(though the scene with Stephen Rea in the room at the end is eerily
similar to the scene with Geoffrey Rush in "House on Haunted
Hill"), but what drags the movie down is the absolutely awful
dialogue and mediocre acting. Stephen Dorff and Natascha McElhone
are laughable in their equally boring roles, while Stephen Rea is
perfectly sinister in his role as The Doctor. If you remember
Rea's role from "Interview with the Vampire", you know just
how creepy he can be. So, basically, this movie was decent to
watch because of the dark and dreary camera work, which was incredibly
similar to that of "Dark City", but this film really bombed in
the script department, which was a joke. And, I really don't get
the purpose of the end scene, when McElhone receives a phone call, only
to have no one respond when she answers. I thought about it and
thought about it, and even asked a couple people in the theater what
they thought about it, and none of us could figure out how it was
relevant. William Malone is a great horror director, and this one
is a nice addition to his growing resume, but he needs to choose
screenplays a little more carefully, because this film came close to
being a complete waste of time. A different cinematographer,
director of photography, and replace Rea as The Doctor, and
this film sucks.
|
|