Popkorn Junkie

MOVIE REVIEW FOR "THE RETURN OF THE KING" STARRING ELIJAH WOOD, VIGGO MORTENSEN, AND SIR IAN MCKELLEN
Popkorn Junkie Home | Archive | About Us | Junkieville | Buzz-Links | Reviewers

Note: This film has a PG-13 rating.

Junkie Rating:

This film received 3 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 3 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 3 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 3 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.

 

Cast and Credits

Peter Jackson (Director)
Elijah Wood
(Frodo)
Viggo Mortensen
(Aragorn)
Sir Ian McKellen
(Gandolf)
Sean Astin
(Sam)
Orlando Bloom
(Legolas)
John Rhys-Davies
(Gimli)
Billy Boyd
(Pip)
Dominic Monaghan
(Merry)
Bernard Hill
(Theoden)
Andy Serkis
(Golem)
Liv Tyler
(Arwen)
Hugo Weaving
(Elrond)

 

 

 

 
      Three years and over a billion dollars later, "Lord of the Rings" has become one of the top three franchises in film history, just behind "Star Wars" and the James Bond series.  For three Decembers in a row, we have all bore the unspeakable lines, the onclave of theatrical advertisements and trailers, and the three hours plus running times for each film.  Now, "Lord of the Rings" is over, with "The Return of the King" serving as the final installment to the series.  And what has LOTR shown us?  Well, other than being one of the most memorable trilogies of all time, it has shown how one director and one perfectly assembled cast can turn a beloved book into life, one hobbit at a time.
 
      In this chapter, we see hobbits Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) struggling their way towards Mount Doom, alongside the computer generated creature Golem (Andy Serkis).  We also find the remainder of the original Fellowship -- Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Legolas (Orlando Bloom), Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) -- trying to find a way to defeat the impending armies of Orakai headed their way.  Pip (Billy Boyd) and Merry (Dominic Monaghan) re-discover Gandolf (Sir Ian McKellen), Arwen (Liv Tyler) starts to die off, and an army of the dead is summoned to fight for Middle Earth.  Now, much more happens in the three hours plus of the film, and most of the ongoing storylines are resolved. 
 
Some noteworthy sidenotes about this film are, as follows:
 
      (1) Sean Astin takes on much more of a weighty role.  If you take time to think about it, Sean Astin is, basically, the star of this chapter, and possibly the focal point of the entire trilogy.  He handles this increase in screen time with admirable acting power and delivers the best role of his career, and that is including "The Goonies" and "Rudy".
 
      (2) Some things happen in the film, seemingly out of nowhere, that will make sense to the LOTR fanatics, but will probably confuse many of the regular movie goers.  For instance, SPOILER, towards the end of the film, we see Gandolf and a fluttering moth, followed by enormous eagles swooping down from the sky.  And, the ending left many people confused as to just what had happened, and all I can say as comfort is that you should read the books.
 
      (3) Beautiful cinematography.  There is one scene in which the armies of Middle Earth are charging towards the enemies on horseback and seem to just wipe them out -- go completely through them.  Watching it on screen was absolutely dazzling and should be excuse enough for this film to, once again, sweep the technical side of the Academy Awards.
 
      Peter Jackson has placed a marvelous cap on this series, and has now fully established himself as, possibly, the most sought after, respected, and powerful directors in Hollywood today.  His vision and determination are the reasons for the success of these films, and his creativity is endless.  Just look at the way he brilliantly concludes the film -- the film does not end until around half an hour after the primary resolution has come about.  That is daring, yet brilliant at the same time.  If you end the film too quickly, the critics eat your brains.  Draw it out just a bit, and you win the respect of the LOTR fanatics and the critics.
 
      Do I believe "The Return of the King" will win Best Picture?  No.  Do I think it should?  No.  I have seen too many other phenomenal motion pictures this year that best this one.  "Mystic River" is a good example, as is "Shattered Glass" and "Master and Commander".  But, I would go out on a limb and say Sean Astin and Viggo Mortensen might find themselves acting nods.  This is a fitting and glorious conclusion to the series and it is highly entertaining, as always.  I cannot say this is the best in the series, because now I consider them to be three as a whole.  And, as a whole, the word flawless creeps to mind.


     --
Billy Ray ( 4 out of 4 pops )

 

Talk about this film with other Popkorn Junkies

 

Other Junkie's opinions.....

      Mike ( 3 out of 4 pops )

     After seeing this film, I walked out of the theatre with mixed emotions about it.  It is certainly a gorgeous film to look at and there are many fine performances, especially by Sean Astin.  However, the film is longer than needed and I actually found myself getting bored somewhat during parts of the movie. My biggest gripe is with the battle scenes which end up being very repetitious and eventually somewhat dull.  Unfortunately the director forget how to make these fight scenes exciting and entertaining... they ended up for the most part being one huge mass of CGI effects characters running thru millions of more CGI characters.  And way too little was made use of Orlando Bloom who at least had a few seconds of some original fight scenes.  But enough of my being the grinch about this film.  I really liked it but the movie needed to be tightened up and shortened to a degree. And the battle scenes needed to be more unique and less the same old stuff we've already seen many times not only in the first two films, but many times already in this one!