Popkorn Junkie


Popkorn Junkie Home | Archive | About Us | Junkieville | Buzz-Links | Reviewers

Buy The Hulk Poster

Buy The Hulk Poster

  
Note: This film has a PG-13 rating.

Junkie Rating:

\This film received 2 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 2 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 2 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.This film received 2 1/2 pops out of 4 pops.


Cast and Credits

Ang Lee
(Director)
Eric Bana
(Bruce Banner) 
Jennifer Connelly
(Betty Ross) 
Sam Elliott
(Ross) 
Josh Lucas
(Talbot) 
Nick Nolte
(Father) 
Paul Kersey
(Young David Banner) 
Cara Buono
(Edith Banner) 

 

Like the movie?  Maybe you'll like...

Buy The Hulk soundtrack
 
       Raging inside Dr Bruce Banner (Eric Bana) is a monster waiting to be unleashed. Anyone familiar with the comic book or the TV series that starred the late Bill Bixby will be familiar with the setup of “Hulk” the new film version of the classic tale by acclaimed director Ang Lee of “Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon” fame.

      For those of you unfamiliar with the tale, when Dr. Banner is exposed to an overdose of Gamma radiation, his body chemistry is altered in such a way that he transforms into a large, green, and destructive creature when he is angered. Naturally, this puts him at odds with the authorities and the military and Banner is forced to live a vagabond existence while he searches for a way to contain his inner rage. In the new version, much of the established background of the characters are removed in favor of a new background that basis the origins of the creature on work begun by Banners father before he was born. It seems that the senior Banner was working for a government lab when he decided to experiment on himself with his new regeneration serums which in turn, caused him to pass on his altered genes to his son Bruce. Flash forward to the present where Bruce is now going by the name Krensler as he is under the impression that his family is dead. He works closely with old-flame Betty Ross (Jennifer Connelly), who still cares for him despite Bruce being very distant emotionally.

      While prepping for an important presentation, Bruce is exposed to an overdose of Gamma radiation that sets the stage for the emergence of the creature as it activates the alterations that were present in his system based on his father’s tamperings.

      It is at this point that the film takes several bad turns that drag the film down. When the creature finally emerges 45 minutes into the 2 hr and 20 minute film, it is underwhelming. While the creature looks interesting, I had the impression that I was watching a computer game, as at no time, did the creature seem to fit into the background and was very clearly superimposed. While the facial and skin textures and reactions of the creature were good, the action sequences were far too few and in between and very underwhelming. Once the creature emerges, it does not take long for Betty’s father General Ross (Sam Elliott), to actively begin plans to destroy or contain the creature as his genes contain the key to vast fortunes for a government contractor and his presence reminds Ross of the threat Banner’s father represented thirty years earlier which Bruce has repressed all of these years.

      I am going to avoid going into too many details of what happens to whom and when but suffice it to say soon the creature is on the loose with the military in hot pursuit fearing the rage of the creature unleashed in a populated area. What I will say however, is that while I was a fan of the series and comic, I was very unhappy with the film version, especially with the huge array of talent that was brought into the film. Connelly and Bana look like they are sleepwalking through the film as the dialogue is so bad and bland that it makes the Star Wars Prequel banter look Shakespearian in comparison. The actors rarely show any emotion at all, and seem to be uninspired by the material. Only Nick Nolte playing the senior Banner puts any emotion into his role, but he is reduced to chewing scenery and spouting lines that elicited groans from many of my colleagues in the press section. The action of the film was very unspectacular as the trailers have shown the majority of the major FX and the few battle scenes unfold in a very ho-hum manner with no pacing, tension, or excitement. I found myself caring little for the characters as they were so emotionless and uninspiring that their fates were of no major consequence other then returning for possible sequels.

      I really wanted to like this film, but I found myself unable to find anything about it to recommend or like. The long gaps when the creature were not on the screen dragged by, and when the creature did appear, it was little payoff. Worse yet, I found myself wanting to leave the film before it was over and I stayed mainly out of professionalism and that is saying a lot as I have willingly sat through many a stinker in my film career.

      With so much talent in the film, and the fantastic FX people at ILM, it is sad to see that something so promising went so wrong. I had hoped that with Lee helming the film, there would be many emotional segments of the struggle to contain the inner beast we all have, or an emotional tug of war blended with gripping action. Sadly there was neither, and as a result, "Hulk" is little more than a bloated production that is soulless and empty.


     --
Gareth Von Kallenbache ( 2 out of 4 pops )

 

Talk about this film with other Popkorn Junkies

 

Other Junkie's opinions.....

      Billy Ray ( 3 1/2 out of 4 pops )

      I can remember sitting in the theatre and seeing my very first trailer for "The Hulk". I remember thinking, "This movie is going to kick ass". And, boy, was I right. I mean -- c'mon -- it was directed by the always impressive Ang Lee, stars Academy Award winner Jennifer Connelly, and Nick Nolte, the new greatest bad guy ever, and the highly nice looking Eric Bana. Not to mention, the special effects are top notch and the director focuses more on plot than big explosions. I like how the underlying theme of the film was that of bad fathers, i.e. Nick Nolte and Sam Elliot. I also liked how Ang Lee used inventive new camera styles to turn a film into a live action comic book. I thought this was the -- besides the first "Batman" and "Superman" -- the best comic book adaptation yet, and really puts "Daredevil" and "Spiderman" to shame. All you have to do is get a great director like Ang Lee, pack it full of incredible actors, and you get one hell of a film. "The Hulk" is fantastic. 

      Matt ( 1 1/2 out of 4 pops)
 
     I'm no comic book fanatic.  However, I do appreciate a good superhero flick like "Spiderman" or "Daredevil".  "The Hulk" doesn't even closely measure to those two films.  First of all, the first hour-or-so is filled with boring exposition.  Yes, I know.  Ang Lee was trying to create a comic book action movie that doesn't ignore plot.  Blah, blah, blah.  "Spider-Man" didn't ignore plot either!  But we didn't have to wait an hour to see our hero shoot out his web and swing from building to building.  Sometimes you just have to give the audience what they want.  Most of the time I say otherwise, but we're not talking about a life-affirming drama here; we're talking about "The Hulk"!  Personally, I'd prefer the old-fashioned muscular-man-painted-green approach used in the TV show, but the CGI Hulk is not bad and I blame the film's faults more on poor writing and direction.  Lee is a versatile director with some fine films under his belt.  "The Ice Storm" is very impressive.  I'm not a "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" fan, but Lee knew what he was doing.  Here, he seems out of his league.  I mean, what was with the damn split-screens?  Not one of those split-screens seemed necessary, and at times I thought there was something wrong with the film projector.  Not a good sign.  They certainly didn't speed up the film's pace.  Eric Bana is not a bad actor, but he's kind of bland and doesn't have a commanding screen presence.  Jennifer Connelly gives the best possible performance she can with her character, and so does Nick Nolte, who seems to think he's in a Eugene O'Neill play.  But I just didn't find the characters or their subplots any interesting.  Finally, why couldn't Lou Ferigno get a decent cameo?  He's practically an extra, in his blink-and-you'll-miss appearance.   

      James ( 3 out of 4 pops )

      Okay first off, I don't like comic books. Never have. I have a few, got  them as gifts (well more like here james, take this magazine-esque  book), but never read them. I liked Tim Burton's Batman, and the  superman movies were okay. I could not care less about "Spiderman",  X-men, or even Spawn. But there was something I always liked about the  Hulk...and again, I never read the comic book, I just like how it's  like a modern King Kong story.  So enough of that, what did I think of the movie, you ask? I want to give the producer who chose Ang Lee to direct this a whole box of kudos. I was worried that this was just a bunch of computer animated action shots stringed together to vaguely resemble a plot, but to my pleasant surprise, I was so wrong. The movie is very artsy fartsy. Ang Lee doesn't have a bad shot, and what's really impressive is that the computer animation is so good it actually looks real! Unlike The Matrix, which was so totally obvious that it was computer generated.  NICK NOLTE F@#^ING RULES!!!! He's a f@#^ing madman in this! Without being over-the-top, but then again, by regular plot standards (non-gamma ray intensive) he would be considered over the top, but I thought he portrayed Bruce's father very well. He deserves a best supporting actor nom but who am I kidding, it's way to early and they don't give those awards to summer fluff. Which is a shame, considering that this movie is not FLUFF! The photography and shot selection is superb, and the use of split screens and freeze frames make the movie feel like you are watching an actual comic book.  Spider man, Spawn, et al, were just a bunch of lame action movies that seemed like were trying to play down the comic book aspect, and that's why they sucked and the hulk rocked.

        Mike ( 3 out of 4 pops )

       Leave it up to Ang Lee to give us a comic book movie that is unlike any other comic book movie made to date. However, there is both bad and good stuff in regards to this statement. Unlike most people it seems, I like the psychological part of the story with the interlocking relationships between son and father, and daughter and father. I thought this added a lot to the motives which drive all these characters to do what they do and let us know these people that much more. This film is much more like King Kong or Frankenstein than it is to the recent stuff like "Spiderman" and X-Men. Every aspect of the animation was superb in my opinion, the close-up details were just great and all the jumping and running scenes seemed to give a perfect view of this enraged creature running amok. I do think the film is too long and many of the numerous flashback scenes could have been eliminated. Lee apparently forgot that often it is much better to leave some things to the imagination rather than having to show onscreen every plot aspect. Also, there should have been much more humor in this film... there were only a few lines that made you laugh. So, cut out 15 minutes or so, tighten up the film, and inject some humor and this would have been a great comic book movie rather than just a very good one.